Two seminars at SCMS

I am at the Shanghai Center of Mathematical Sciences at the Jiangwan campus of Fudan University in Shanghai. There are two seminars here today.

Survivor set of Gauss map with a hole at 1

This was a talk by Lingmin Liau from the University of Wuhan. This is joint work with Cheng Liu.

First motivation & main results

In 2003, there was a paper by Jun Wu asking “How many points have the same Engel and Sylvester expansions?” Let us explain what these expansions are.

Engel’s expansion is \[\begin{equation} x= \frac{1}{d_{1}} + \frac{1}{d_{1} d_{2}} + \frac{1}{d_{1} d_{2} d_{3}} + \dots, \text{ for } 2 \leq d_{1} \leq d_{2} \leq \dots \end{equation}\]

Sylvester’s expansion is \[\begin{equation} x = \frac{1}{s_{1}} + \frac{1}{s_{2}} + \frac{1}{s_{3}} + \dots \text{ where } s_{k+1} \geq s_{j}(s_{j} - 1)+ 1 \end{equation}\]

This is related to dynamics via the following map. \[\begin{align} T(x) & = x - \tfrac{1}{ \lfloor \frac{1}{x}\rfloor + 1} \implies x \\ & = \frac{1}{ \lfloor \frac{1}{x}\rfloor + 1 } + Tx = \frac{1}{s_{1}} + \frac{1}{ \lfloor \frac{1}{ Tx} \rfloor + 1} + T^{2} x \dots \\ & = \frac{1}{s_{1}} + \frac{1}{ s_{2} } + \dots \end{align}\] There is a similar dynamics map for the first expansion which I did not understand.

Now we define the set \[\begin{equation} E = \{x : d_{1} = s_{1} , d_{2} = s_{2} , \dots\}. \end{equation}\] Then what is \(\dim_{H} E\)? The main result of Jun Wu is that this dimension is \(1/2\).

Before this Galambus showed in 1981, 1996 that the Lebesgue measure is 0.

\[\begin{equation} E(\alpha) := \{ x \in [0,1] \mid x \text{ has the same regular continued fractions and $\alpha$-CF}\}. \end{equation}\] Then, what is the \(\dim E(\alpha)\)?

We assume \(\alpha \in [0,1]\). For this, we must study the map \(T_{\alpha}\) which acts on \([\alpha - 1, \alpha)\) via \[\begin{equation} T_{\alpha}(x) = \begin{cases} |\tfrac{1}{x}| - \lfloor |\tfrac{1}{x}| + 1 - \alpha\rfloor & \text{ if }x \neq 0 \\ 0 & \text{ otherwise} \end{cases}. \end{equation}\]

For \(x \in \mathbb{R}\), let \(b_{0} \in \mathbb{Z}\) be such that \(x-b_{0} \in [\alpha-1,\alpha)\). For this

Here is the first theorem.

This is something similar to a phenomenon called Devil’s stairs (I don’t understand). The constant intervals of \(\alpha \mapsto S(\alpha)\) are

Here is the second theorem.

We have the bifurcation set (complement of the union of the above intervals) defined as: \[\begin{equation} \varepsilon = \{ x \in [0,1] \mid T^{k} x \leq x , \forall k \geq 0\}. \end{equation}\] Here \(T\) is the Gauss map \(x \mapsto \{\tfrac{1}{x}\}\). Then the Hausdorf dimension \(\dim_{H} \varepsilon = 1\).

Relation with the survivor sets of open dynamical system

Define \[\begin{equation} E(\alpha) : = \{x \in [0,1) : T^{n} x \leq \alpha, \forall n \geq 0\}. \end{equation}\] This is called a “survivor set”.

We will prove that the \(S(\alpha)\) in our question satisfies \[\begin{equation} S(\alpha) = \{x \in [0,1] : T^{n} x < \alpha \forall n \geq 0\}. \end{equation}\] This is the same thing as \(E(\alpha)\) but with inequality turned into a strict inequality. We get \[\begin{equation} S(\alpha) \subseteq E(\alpha) \subseteq S(\alpha) \cup \mathbb{Q} \cup \bigsqcup_{n=0}^{ \infty } \{ x \in [0,1), T^{n} x = \alpha\}. \end{equation}\]

Main argument

For our interest, we study \[\begin{align} S(\tfrac{1}{n}) & = \{x \mid T^{k} x < \tfrac{1}{n} \forall k \geq 0\} \\ & = \{x \mid a_{k} > n \forall k \geq 0\}. \end{align}\] We have \[\begin{equation} \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \dim_{H} S(\tfrac{1}{n}) = \frac{1}{2}. \end{equation}\] This is due to Good from 1941. Then \(S(0) = ?\). This is the set \(\{T^{n} x < 0\} = \{\}\)

Intermediate step

To prove the intermediate step \(\dim_{H} \varepsilon = 1\), there is \[\begin{equation} \bigcup_{m=2} \{x = [1,m,x_{3} x_{4} \dots ] \mid x_{i} \leq m - 1, \forall i \geq 3\} \subseteq \varepsilon. \end{equation}\]

\[\begin{equation} \forall x = [1,m,x_{3},x_{4},\dots] , m \geq 2 , x_{i} \leq m-1, \forall i \geq 3. \end{equation}\] We then have \[\begin{equation} T x = [m ,x_{3} x_{4} \dots ] < x = [1 \dots ] \geq 2 \end{equation}\] and for \(k \geq 2\) \[\begin{equation} T^{k} x = [x_{k+1}, x_{k+2} , \dots ] < x= [1,m,x_{3}, \dots ] \end{equation}\]

\[\begin{equation} \dim_{H} \bigcup_{m=2}^{\infty} \{ x = [1,m_{1},x_{3},\dots] : x_{i} \leq m - 1\}. \end{equation}\] Then we have \[\begin{equation} = \sup_{m \geq 2} \dim_{H}\{ x = [1,m,x_{3},x_{4},\dots ] : x_{i} \leq m-1, \forall i \geq 3 \} \end{equation}\] Then with this, for some reason we get our result.

Final remarks

We have \(F(\alpha):= S(\alpha) \cap (\text{Bounded})\). We can prove \(\alpha \mapsto \dim_{H} F(\alpha)\) is continuous on \((0,1)\). This is related to some IFS (I don’t understand).

Density of shapes of periodic tori: Part I (the cubic case)

The speaker is Nguyen-Thi Dang. She is from Université Paris-Saclay.

This is joint work with myself and J. Li. See also my notes here.

A dynamical problem

Consider \(G = \mathrm{SL}(3,\mathbb{R})\) and \(\Gamma = \mathrm{SL}(3,\mathbb{Z})\). We have \[\begin{equation} A = \{ \begin{bmatrix} a_{1} & & \\ & a_{2} & \\ & & a_{3} \end{bmatrix} \mid a_{i} > 0, a_{1}a_{2}a_{3} = 1 \}. \end{equation}\] We also have \[\begin{equation} M = \{ \begin{bmatrix} \pm 1 & & \\ & \pm 1 & \\ & & \pm 1 \end{bmatrix}, \det( \cdot ) = 1 \} \end{equation}\] We have \(\mathfrak{a} = \log A = \{ (t_{1},t_{2},t_{3}) \mid \sum_{{i}}^{} t_{i}= 0\}.\)

A periodic torus is \[\begin{equation} C(A) = \{ \text{compact } A-\text{orbit}\}. \end{equation}\]

For \(F \in C(A)\), the set of periods \[\begin{equation} P(F) = \{ Y \in \mathfrak{a} \mid e^{Y} z = z, \forall z \in F\}. \end{equation}\]

Then \(P(F) \subseteq \mathfrak{a}\) is a \(2\)-lattice in \(\mathfrak{a} \simeq \mathbb{R}^{2}\). Fix an isomorphism \(\mathfrak{a} \simeq \mathbb{R}^{2}\). We then have \({P}(F) = \sqrt{\mathrm{covol}( P(F))} g_{F} \mathbb{Z}^{2}\) for some \(g_{F} \in \mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R})\)

We define a shape \([P(F)] = g_{F} \mathrm{SL}({2},\mathbb{Z}) \in \mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R})/\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z})\).

(D,G,L)

The set of shapes of periodic tori in \(M \backslash \mathrm{SL}(3,\mathbb{R})/ \mathrm{SL}(3,\mathbb{Z})\) is dense in \(\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R})/\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z})\).

A construction

We will look at \(0 < a_{1} < a_{2}\) in \(\mathbb{N}\) such that \(a_{1} \gg 1\) and \(a_{2} - a_{1} \gg 1\). Then \(f(X) = X(X-a_{1})(X-a_{2}) - 1\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}\).

We consider the field \(K = \mathbb{Q}[X]/ \langle f(X)\rangle\) This is isomorphic to \(\mathbb{Q}^{3}\) additively.

Ordered embeddings

For \(\sigma = (\sigma_{1},\sigma_{2},\sigma_{3}) : K \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) are given by \(X \mapsto \alpha_{i}\) where \(\alpha_{1},\alpha_{2},\alpha_{3}\) are the roots of the polynomial.

Dirichlet’s unit theorem

(DUT)

For all \([\mathcal{O}: \mathcal{O}_{K}] < \infty\) and \(\mathcal{O}\) is a subring \[\begin{equation} \mathcal{O}^{\times} \simeq \langle \pm 1 , \beta_{1}, \beta_{2} \rangle \simeq \mathbb{Z}^{2}. \end{equation}\] That is, multiplicatively \(\mathcal{O}^{\times} \simeq \mathbb{Z}^{2}\).

Using this, one can construct a periodic torus. We consider the action of \(K^{\times}\) on \(K\) and get \[\begin{align} K & \xrightarrow[]{} \mathbb{R}^{3} \\ x & \mapsto \mathrm{diag}( \sigma_{1}(x),\sigma_{2}(x), \sigma_{3}(x) ). \end{align}\] Then we look at \(\mathcal{O}^{\times}\) acting on \(\mathcal{O}\) and write \(\mathcal{O} = h_{\mathcal{O}} \mathbb{Z}^{3} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{3}\).

For \(\mathcal{O} = \mathbb{Z}[X]/ \langle f(X)\rangle = \mathbb{Z}[\alpha]\), then \(\mathcal{O}^{\times} = \langle \pm 1, \alpha, \alpha- a_{1}\rangle\).

Indeed, observe that \(\alpha, \alpha-a_{1},\alpha - a_{2} \in \mathcal{O}^{\times}\). This lemma is due to an optimal inequality for cubic fields by Cusick.

But we want density of shapes!

Congruence conditions

What we will try is \[\begin{align} (a_{1},a_{2}) & \simeq (0,1)\pmod{2^{c}}, \text{ for }c \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0} \\ (a_{1},a_{2}) & \simeq (1,0)\pmod{3^{d}}, \text{ for }d \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0} \\ (a_{1},a_{2}) & \simeq (1,1)\pmod{5^{r}}, \text{ for }r \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0} \\ \end{align}\] Then we have that \(\mathcal{O}_{(c,d,r)} = \mathbb{Z} + 2^{c} 3^{d} 5^{r} \mathcal{O}\) satisfies \[\begin{equation} \mathcal{O}_{(c,d,r)}^{\times} = \{ \pm \alpha^{m} (\alpha - a_{1})^{n} \mid \underbrace{ \begin{cases} \varphi_{(0,1)}(m,n) \simeq 0 \pmod{ 7\cdot 2^{c-1}} \\ \varphi_{(1,0)}(m,n) \simeq 0 \pmod{ 8\cdot 3^{d-1}} \\ \varphi_{(1,1)}(m,n) \simeq 0 \pmod{ 24\cdot 5^{r-1}} \\ \end{cases}}_{\text{ defines a lattice }\Lambda_{(c,d,r)} \subseteq \mathbb{Z}^{2}} \} \end{equation}\] where \(\varphi_{(0,1)}, \varphi_{(1,0)}, \varphi_{(1,1)} \in (\mathbb{Z}^{2})^{*}\).

Parameters

(D,G,L)

\[\overline{\{ [\Lambda_{(c,d,r)}]\} }= \mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R})/\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z})\]


This page was updated on April 21, 2026.
Main Page